Grep not actually reproducible on Arch but do we have a bigger issue?

[Holger Levsen]

On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 11:56:17PM +0200, cen wrote:
> Perhaps rebuilderd needs a feature where GOOD packages are also periodically
> rebuilt in exponential back-off style and compared against current upstream
> build and also our last GOOD build. This would confirm whether a package is
> reproducible if built in a short time window but also help uncover longer
> time window issues that are currently hidden.
 
I think so too. There's several software which fails to build in the future,
mostly due to assumptions in tests breaking but also key material expiring and so on.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Covid is like the flu.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20260506/bbdf624c/attachment.sig>