[rb-general] Please review the draft for week 180's blog post

[Holger Levsen]

Hi Chris,

On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 08:31:27PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I don't think it matters much when we release the weekly blog, as long
> > as its somewhat close to the last week
> I think this is the only place where we differ in philosophy; I feel
> fairly strongly that providing "credit" — or some similarly vague and hand-
> wavey concept — should be as close to the event itself as possible.

I dont think we disagree here, thats fully covered by what I wrote and
ment.

> (Exaggerating for effect, thanking someone for something they did a year
> ago is not /quite/ the same to the unfortunately-irrational human brain,
> after all.)

sure, but 9 to 2 days after the fact is not that late.

and, and this is why i brought this up, several many times at least my
work was not credited properly because, i dunno, and then i had too
little time to add the credits myself. so in my book allowing (a
little!) more time actually helps to better achieve what we both want.

:)

> > which I think Tuesday noon UTC qualifies
> Sure. Can we try noon UTC for the next fortnight or so and see how that
> feels?

sure! Tuesday noon UTC is exactly what I proposed in the end :)

Thanks!


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20181008/7c5e511a/attachment.sig>