[rb-general] Clarification re SOURCE_BUILD_EPOCH and clamping
infinity0 at debian.org
Mon Oct 23 17:50:00 CEST 2017
> doh, I forgot to say what made me comment in the first place:
> I think the sentence '(This is sometimes called "timestamp clamping".)'
> shouldn't be enclosed in brackets, mostly because in general one should
> either not use brackets or not say it at all.
> As another point, its hardly "sometimes" if we call it that in the
> revision history.
> So I'd suggest to change this to:
> Where build processes embed timestamps that are not "current", but are
> nevertheless still specific to one execution of the build process, they
> MUST use a timestamp no later than the value of this variable. This is
> called "timestamp clamping".
> or maybe "this is often called…"
Done, I kept "often" in, thanks for the suggestion. Originally I was about halfway on omitting the brackets, but as you say, giving weight to it is good if we'll be amending the spec for it in the first place.
More information about the rb-general