[rb-general] GNU coding standards discussion

[Ian Jackson]

(resending due to my MUA having broken the previous copy)

Ludovic Courtès writes ("Re: [rb-general] GNU coding standards discussion"):
> I think what matters is that the recommendation that RMS suggested at=

> the very beginning ends up in the Standards.

I agree.  But I don't think I can win that argument on gnu-proc-disc.

It will be hard to convince RMS that the GNU coding standards should
be recommending reproducibility without specifying what that means.

If you want to suggest this on gnu-prog-disc (if you're in that
discussion, sorry if I missed you there) I will support you of course.

Regards,
Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.