[rb-general] GNU coding standards discussion
ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri Dec 2 16:03:23 CET 2016
Ludovic Courtès writes ("Re: [rb-general] GNU coding standards discussion"):
> I think what matters is that the recommendation that RMS suggested at
> the very beginning ends up in the Standards.
I agree. But I don't think I can win that argument on gnu-proc-disc.
It will be hard to convince RMS that the GNU coding standards should
be recommending reproducibility without specifying what that means.
If you want to suggest this on gnu-prog-disc (if you're in that
discussion, sorry if I missed you there) I will support you of course.
Ian Jackson <ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
More information about the rb-general