[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] Repeat the last commit's syntax change, as it fixed the issue in that instance.

[Daniel Shahaf (@danielsh)]

Daniel Shahaf pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
245f9bf7 by Daniel Shahaf at 2022-02-11T14:37:28+00:00
Repeat the last commit's syntax change, as it fixed the issue in that instance.

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- _docs/timestamps.md


Changes:

=====================================
_docs/timestamps.md
=====================================
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ the hope of wider adoption.
 (Originally `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` was introduced by the Debian reproducible builds
 folks and since has been adapted widely.)
 
-[^list]: As of 2015-10-26, the following tools are known to support `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`: help2man, Sphinx. Also, [others have been modified locally in Debian](https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Reading_the_variable) already to support this.
+[^list]:
+    As of 2015-10-26, the following tools are known to support `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`: help2man, Sphinx. Also, [others have been modified locally in Debian](https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Reading_the_variable) already to support this.
 
 Changes required to support `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` are usually fairly
 small and easy to write. Patches for tools which don't yet support the



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/245f9bf7d8d48a8c15662cfa41b5c76cdbb184fa

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/245f9bf7d8d48a8c15662cfa41b5c76cdbb184fa
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20220211/a4242f4a/attachment.htm>