[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] 2 commits: 2022-11: remove gendered reference.

[Vagrant Cascadian (@vagrant)]

Vagrant Cascadian pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
877a0547 by Vagrant Cascadian at 2022-12-08T09:54:58-08:00
2022-11: remove gendered reference.

- - - - -
f39d8a05 by Vagrant Cascadian at 2022-12-08T10:14:55-08:00
2022-11: Update with additional NMUs.

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- _reports/2022-11.md


Changes:

=====================================
_reports/2022-11.md
=====================================
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ On [our mailing list](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general/
 
 * Adrian Diglio from Microsoft asked "[How to Add a New Project within Reproducible Builds](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2022-November/002726.html)" which solicited a number of replies.
 
-* Vagrant Cascadian posed an interesting question regarding the difference between "test builds" vs "rebuilds" (or "verification rebuilds"). As [Vagrant poses in his message](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2022-November/002747.html), "they're both useful for slightly different purposes, and it might be good to clarify the distinction […]."
+* Vagrant Cascadian posed an interesting question regarding the difference between "test builds" vs "rebuilds" (or "verification rebuilds"). As [Vagrant poses in their message](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2022-November/002747.html), "they're both useful for slightly different purposes, and it might be good to clarify the distinction […]."
 
 ---
 
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ On [our mailing list](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general/
 
 Over 50 reviews of Debian packages were added this month, another 48 were updated and almost 30 were removed, all of which adds to [our knowledge about identified issues](https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/index_issues.html). Two new issue types were added as well. [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-notes/commit/9c673bfa)][[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-notes/commit/bbe35ed0)].
 
-Vagrant Cascadian announced on [our mailing list](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/) another online sprint to help 'clear the huge backlog of reproducible builds patches submitted' by performing NMUs ([Non-Maintainer Uploads](https://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerUpload)). The first such sprint took place on September 22nd, but others were held on October 6th and October 20th. There was another sprint that occurred in November, however, which resulted in the following progress:
+Vagrant Cascadian announced on [our mailing list](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/) another online sprint to help 'clear the huge backlog of reproducible builds patches submitted' by performing NMUs ([Non-Maintainer Uploads](https://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerUpload)). The first such sprint took place on September 22nd, but others were held on October 6th and October 20th. There were two additional sprints that occurred in November, however, which resulted in the following progress:
 
 * Chris Lamb:
 
@@ -107,9 +107,14 @@ Vagrant Cascadian announced on [our mailing list](https://lists.reproducible-bui
 
     * [`ddd`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ddd) (Fixed [#834016](https://bugs.debian.org/834016))
     * [`libpam-ldap`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libpam-ldap) (Fixed [#834050](https://bugs.debian.org/834050))
-    * [`nsnake`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nsnake/833612)
+    * [`nsnake`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nsnake/) (Fixed [#833612](https://bugs.debian.org/833612))
     * [`quvi`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/quvi) (Fixed [#835259](https://bugs.debian.org/835259))
     * [`stressapptest`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/stressapptest) (Fixed [#831587](https://bugs.debian.org/831587) & [#986653](https://bugs.debian.org/986653))
+    * [`tcpreen`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tcpreen) (Fixed [#831585](https://bugs.debian.org/831585))
+    * [`boolector`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/boolector) (Fixed [#1023886](https://bugs.debian.org/1023886))
+    * [`tsdecrypt`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tsdecrypt) (Fixed [#829713](https://bugs.debian.org/829713) & [#1022130](https://bugs.debian.org/1022130))
+    * [`wbxml2`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/wbxml2) (QA upload fixed build path issues)
+    * [`tercpp`](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tercpp) (QA upload fixed build path issues)
 
 Lastly, Roland Clobus posted his [latest update of the status of reproducible Debian ISO images](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2022-November/002760.html) on our mailing list. This reports that 'all major desktops build reproducibly with *bullseye*, *bookworm* and *sid*' as well as that no custom patches needed to applied to Debian *unstable* for this result to occur. During November, however, Roland [proposed some modifications to *live-setup*](https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/live-setup/-/merge_requests/2) and the rebuild script has been adjusted to fix the failing Jenkins tests for Debian *bullseye* [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/merge_requests/293)][[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/-/commit/e237cab3ed87826b1c25b068b88fabcecf020d21)].
 



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/compare/a8ab84b7330b6367df0ef0a1dae35269d7e885c5...f39d8a0592c0a2ae886d9d51b9c133426b143767

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/compare/a8ab84b7330b6367df0ef0a1dae35269d7e885c5...f39d8a0592c0a2ae886d9d51b9c133426b143767
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20221208/e1cf8ac5/attachment.htm>