r-b as a recommendation in standards

[Holger Levsen]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann via rb-general wrote:
> On our summit in Hamburg we discussed that r-b should be listed as a
> recommendation or requirement in new standards to encourage people to ensure
> builds are reproducible.

thank you!

I've now collected this thread into
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/issues/59
so this issue can be turned into a merge request eventually!


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

Imagine god created trillions of galaxies but freaks out because some dude
kisses another.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20241014/8669596f/attachment.sig>