Two questions about build-path reproducibility in Debian

[Chris Lamb]

Vagrant Cascadian wrote:

> There are real-world build path issues, and while it is possible to work
> around them in various ways, I think they are still issues worth fixing
> to make it easier to debug other issues, although deprioritizing them
> makes sense, given buildd.debian.org now normalizes them.

+1.

And for this reason, I think we should keep the buildpath-related
bugs as well. They should all be 'wishlist' priority anyway, and I
wouldn't like to bet my hat that the usertag metadata is accurate and
comprehensive enough to blindly close them in the first place. (We
only really used the usertags to do some rough-and-ready statistics
on broad issue categories.)


Best wishes,

-- 
      o
    ⬋   ⬊      Chris Lamb
   o     o     reproducible-builds.org 💠
    ⬊   ⬋
      o