NetBSD Reproducibility Report #6

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

Hi!

I've just published the 6th NetBSD reproducibility report [1]. It how
also mentions the (taken from the GitHub-hosted GIT repo) actual
commit that was used for all builds (further patches may have been
added, they're visible in the individual logs.)

  Differences to the 5th report:

  Two consecutive builds on Linux:
    * hp300-m68k failed to build (full HDD on my side---sorry!)
    * vax-vax now builds again (failed last time)

  Two consecutive builds on NetBSD:
    * evbarm-earmv6 was reproducible last time, but is no longer. [2]
    * evbarm-earmv6eb wasn't reproducible last time, but is now.
    * iyonix-earm     wasn't reproducible last time, but is now.

Thanks,
  Jan-Benedict

[1] http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/reports/netbsd-reproducibility-overview-6.html
[2] Differences are in the sets/kern-RPI.tgz and kernel/netbsd-RPI.gz,
    kernel/netbsd-RPI.img.gz, binary/gzimg/rpi.img.gz (and all
    checksum files.) `diffoscope` output is:
	--- 1/netbsd
	+++ 2/netbsd
	├── readelf --wide --decompress --hex-dump=.data {}
	│ @@ -39663,15 +39663,15 @@
	│    0x8075aec0 cb95ae3d 67a83794 5d66b10e e0878b3a ...=g.7.]f.....:
	│    0x8075aed0 e1cb3464 82f76b1f 57457473 b2f23473 ..4d..k.WEts..4s
	│    0x8075aee0 2e44e999 10e4ae75 6cf2303d 939f2977 .D.....ul.0=..)w
	│    0x8075aef0 def6209f 3a62777c b4cab72f c1c282e5 .. .:bw|.../....
	│    0x8075af00 069f9a82 29137239 dd260ab5 acbd5d30 ....).r9.&....]0
	│    0x8075af10 352c2d23 6b180d07 58c003b2 32c30245 5,-#k...X...2..E
	│    0x8075af20 ea307a14 e7294049 0c605693 bf010ce4 .0z..)@I.`V.....
	│ -  0x8075af30 33f94780 00000000 00000000 00000000 3.G.............
	│ +  0x8075af30 33f94880 00000000 00000000 00000000 3.H.............
	│    0x8075af40 00000000 01000000 3c800080 00000000 ........<.......
	│    0x8075af50 00000100 12000000 b4810080 00000000 ................
	│    0x8075af60 00000100 22000000 40800080 00000000 ...."... at .......
	│    0x8075af70 00000100 33000000 0000a080 00000000 ....3...........
	│    0x8075af80 00001400 41000000 0040a080 00000000 ....A.... at ......
	│    0x8075af90 00001400 53000000 90800080 00000000 ....S...........
	│    0x8075afa0 00000100 6f000000 28810080 00000000 ....o...(.......

    As that's kind of meaningless, I've started two manual builds.
    Maybe they also show a difference here, then I can try to track it
    down to the actual object file that changed.
-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20241208/0fc274b9/attachment.sig>