Help us map the reproducible builds ecosystem
Roland Clobus
rclobus at rclobus.nl
Thu Aug 5 13:45:10 UTC 2021
Hello Chris and list,
On 05/08/2021 12:45, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> In order to better grow and understand the Reproducible Builds project
>> and community, a handful of us are in the process of building an
>> "ecosystem map".
>
> https://pad.riseup.net/p/rbecosystemmapping-keep
...
> If "% reproducible" doesn't make sense for an entity... [snip]
Looking at Debian (with the perspective that I have), there could be
several metrics regarding reproducibility in percent.
The current metric shows how many of the Debian packages are
reproducibly (going from source to .deb), but there are also a few
binary files, that are currently distributed, that build on top of that.
E.g. the live-build scripts generate a binary from a config file and
.deb files to an .iso file.
Such binaries would be:
* (netinst/DVD1) Debian-installer images (the official ones or generated
by simple-cdd or ...)
* live images (generated by live-wrapper, live-build or ...)
* Docker images
Would it be useful to add such additional category in the ecosystem?
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20210805/d13a7927/attachment.sig>
More information about the rb-general
mailing list