[rb-general] Addresses in (I)Python output

[Santiago Torres Arias]

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 08:15:28PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> > Even for documentation builds, removing addresses entirely could have
> > downsides.
> […]
> > 	   >>> hex(id(c.__class__))
> > 	   '0x7352a0'
> > 	   >>> hex(id(cls.C))
> > 	   '0x4198d0'
> 
> Indeed, but I'm not sure we were really suggesting that we normalise
> all "\b0x[0-9a-z]+\b", rather that we patch the "repr"-like routine
> which would not have any affect on the above.
> 
> 
> Regards,
To add more context, this is a similar case on sphinx:

    https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/3897

Cheers!
-Santiago
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20190925/27bc59e7/attachment.sig>