[rb-general] Style Guide Updates

Elio Qoshi elio at ura.design
Mon Jan 21 01:23:17 CET 2019


Chris,

Sorry, I'm not sure if we missed each other's point. Yeah I meant with "integration" also applying the changes to the production website, something which we would do. We don't expect to "hand off" designs and others to implement them, as often times they end up not in the same way we all envisioned the design. 


Also, to my understanding the website should use the style guide on a component level, not layout level, so some things should stay decoupled.

In any case, I'd like to improve the visual appearance and usability of the website as I don't think it does the project justice the way it is presented right now (please don't get me wrong). If you have a clear idea on what you could need help with, we'd be happy to see how we can help.

--
Elio Qoshi
Founder & Creative Lead
Ura Design
https://ura.design
PGP Key Fingerprint: 5FFA D567 E102 6ECA BD30 073F AA03 F088 198F 6749

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 11:27 PM, Chris Lamb <lamby at debian.org> wrote:

> Elio,
> 

> > I was actually thinking that this work would also include integration of
> > any new designs. After all, that's what we did with the style guide; we
> > integrated it ourselves into Jekyll.
> 

> Ah, I see the confusion here: by "integration" I was always meaning
> the integration it into our existing website and infrastructure, not to
> have a standalone guide (which may or may not be Jekyll-based).
> 

> > As I said, it would be good to know what priorities you'd address first
> > as I still haven't understood what's the most pressing thing.
> 

> The problems I have are in simply finding the time to actually finish
> the existing migration of content and styling from the guide you
> graciously and carefully produced.
> 

> Before that is done, refreshing the style seems a little premature
> and indeed would introduce unnecessary overhead as it would
> essentially necessitate a 3-way merge!
> 

> How about you check back with us in, say, 3 or 4 months to see where
> we are at? At that point I am sure we will have a better idea of how
> we can help each other.
> 

> Regards,
> 

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

>       ,''`.
>      : :'  :     Chris Lamb
>      `. `'`      lamby at debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
>        `-
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: publickey - elio at ura.design - 0x5FFAD567.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 1801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20190121/16fb4343/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 509 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20190121/16fb4343/attachment.sig>


More information about the rb-general mailing list