[rb-general] Making CMake packages reproducible

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Sat Oct 6 16:25:07 CEST 2018

On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 03:37:53PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Seems a valid question to me.
> Also addressed to the right mailinglist.
> Now I wonder why it was replied with silence.

Geert, i'm sorry but your mail is mostly noise and not helpful at all.
Please don't do this, at least not in that passive aggressive style.
Pinging a mail and stating that your interested in this topic as well
and that no answer has been given is much more friendly, though probably
also not much more helpful, as sometimes people simply dont know an
answer or are too busy to reply. For example I know that
is still both unanswered as well as on some people's todo list to

That said, Peter said on irc...

16:48 < Lekensteyn> regarding the RPATH issue in CMake, I have filed a
report at https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/18413

and if you go there, you'll see that there has been plenty replies
there, which is probably also why nobody has replied here.


       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20181006/e93e9ade/attachment.sig>

More information about the rb-general mailing list