[rb-general] Final Logo Voting
Arnout Engelen
arnout at bzzt.net
Wed May 23 14:27:26 CEST 2018
Hi,
As promised I tallied the votes and the preliminary winner is:
color/wordmark #4, see attached.
Preliminary, because someone should please reproduce this result first :D
And you can:
git clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tech-ctte
cd tech-ctte/scripts
# copy the attached file tallysheet.txt to that directory
./pocket-devotee --option "1:logo #1" --option "2:logo #2" \
--option "3:logo #3" --option "4:logo #4" --option "5:NOTA" < tallysheet.txt
Which gives:
Option 1 "logo #1"
Option 2 "logo #2"
Option 3 "logo #3"
Option 4 "logo #4"
Option 5 "NOTA"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5
=== === === === ===
Option 1 1 2 1 6
Option 2 5 2 2 6
Option 3 5 5 1 7
Option 4 6 5 6 7
Option 5 1 1 0 0
Looking at row 2, column 1, 2
received 5 votes over 1
Looking at row 1, column 2, 1
received 1 votes over 2.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 6 >= 2
Option 2 Reached quorum: 6 >= 2
Option 3 Reached quorum: 7 >= 2
Option 4 Reached quorum: 7 >= 2
Option 1 passes Majority. 6.000 (6/1) > 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 6.000 (6/1) > 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 5 - 1) = 4 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 5 - 2) = 3 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 1 by ( 6 - 1) = 5 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 5 by ( 6 - 1) = 5 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 2 by ( 5 - 2) = 3 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 2 by ( 5 - 2) = 3 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 5 by ( 6 - 1) = 5 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 3 by ( 6 - 1) = 5 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 5 by ( 7 - 0) = 7 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 5 by ( 7 - 0) = 7 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 4 "logo #4"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 4 "logo #4"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Do you agree I used pocket-devotee correctly? :)
Thanks to all that participated, from Ura and from the community, leading
up to this great result! I'm looking forward to showing it off :D.
Kind regards,
Arnout
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Arnout Engelen <arnout at bzzt.net> wrote:
> Since this was requested earlier we should do a private voting again,
> which I'll happily to host.
>
> The rules for the color/wordmark voting are the same as for the Logo, see
> https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2018-April/000848.html
>
> To vote,
>
> a.) go to https://demo.identihub.co/project/rb-logo-candidates and look
> at the 4 options
> b.) fill out the form below and mail it to me. You will get a (manual)
> confirmation mail from me.
>
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [ ] Choice 1: Logo #1
> [ ] Choice 2: Logo #2
> [ ] Choice 3: Logo #3
> [ ] Choice 4: Logo #4
> [ ] Choice 5: None Of The Above
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> There are 5 choices in the form, which you may rank with numbers between
> 1 and 5. In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1.
> Place a 2 in the brackets next to your next choice. Continue until you
> reach your last choice. Do not enter a number smaller than 1 or larger
> than 5.
>
> You may skip numbers, leave some choices unranked, and rank options
> equally. Unranked choices are considered equally the least desired
> choices, and ranked below all ranked choices.
>
> To vote "no, no matter what", rank "None Of The Above" as more desirable
> than the unacceptable choices, or you may rank the "None Of The Above"
> choice and leave choices you consider unacceptable blank. (Note: if the
> "None Of The Above" choice is unranked, then it is equal to all other
> unranked choices, if any -- no special consideration is given to the
> "None Of The Above" choice by the voting software).
>
>
> I will close voting on Tuesday, the 22th of May 2018.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Arnout
>
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Elio Qoshi <elio at ura.design> wrote:
>> As the voting is getting delayed, I'd suggest to voice your preferred
>> option here. Please indicate which logo (1-4) you'd see most closely as
>> the upcoming Reproducible Builds Logo. If you have any comments and
>> thoughts, please let us know as well (although we can't do any further
>> changes at this point anymore).
>>
>> You can see the final candidates here:
>>
>> https://demo.identihub.co/project/rb-logo-candidates
>>
>> After the logo has been chosen, we will implement the style decisions
>> into the styleguide which currently is on Ura's git repos and can be
>> migrated to Debian infrastructure later on.
>>
>> If for any reason anyone would like to vote anonymously, please send me
>> an email. You can find my Public Key here:
>> https://github.com/uracreative/ura.design/blob/master/pgp-public-keys/publickey.elio%40ura.design.asc
>>
>> Looking forward to the results!
>>
>> Elio
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rb-general at lists.reproducible-builds.org mailing list
>>
>> To change your subscription options, visit https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general.
>>
>> To unsubscribe, send an email to rb-general-unsubscribe at lists.reproducible-builds.org.
-------------- next part --------------
V: 3142- vote1
V: 54213 vote2
V: 4321- vote3
V: 1234- vote4
V: 4421- vote5
V: 4321- vote6
V: 4321- vote7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rb.svg
Type: image/svg+xml
Size: 8093 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20180523/5c755368/attachment.svg>
More information about the rb-general
mailing list