[rb-general] Final Logo Voting

[Vagrant Cascadian]

On 2018-05-15, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> a.) go to https://demo.identihub.co/project/rb-logo-candidates and look
>     at the 4 options
> b.) fill out the form below and mail it to me. You will get a (manual)
>     confirmation mail from me.
>
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [ ] Choice 1: Logo #1
> [ ] Choice 2: Logo #2
> [ ] Choice 3: Logo #3
> [ ] Choice 4: Logo #4
> [ ] Choice 5: None Of The Above
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

It would have been good if something descriptive were in each of the
choices in the body of the vote: e.g. Logo #1, Montserrat,
Blue-Orange. (or if not possible to be in the body of the vote due to
voting software restrictions, in the text leading up to it).

Referencing logos solely by numbers seems rather ambiguous, especially
when there have been several iterations of logo numbers and at times the
reference points for which numbers meant what were used differently by
different people.

Voting by reference to a webpage which may potentially change,
accidentally or intentionally, seems a bit risky. I'm fairly
sure/hopeful it won't result in any major problems for this particular
vote, but in a contentious vote, this could be problematic.

That said, I think all the logos should be placed above "None of the
Above" so good work! I'll submit my formal vote in a moment.

live well,
  vagrant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20180516/d0b9ea9d/attachment.sig>