[rb-general] Comparison of the Debian and Arch .buildinfo approaches (was: Re: buildinfo filename convention)
Chris Lamb
lamby at debian.org
Sun Aug 19 17:37:11 CEST 2018
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Just https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/merge_requests/3
> is closed via Chris's NMU, isn't it?
No; #900409 and #900410 in src:mtools were blocking useful progress on
this merge request. I NMU'd that package, not the installer itself:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/977829/accepted-mtools-4018-21-source-amd64-into-unstable/
> I'm also thinking about documenting the different types of .buildinfo
> files we have somewhere, and I somewhat refrain from using the Debian
> wiki, but maybe I shouldn't?
Did you consider adding them to somewhere on our website? Whilst there
may not be the optimal place yet it's preferable to adding more content
to the Debian Wiki.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` lamby at debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
More information about the rb-general
mailing list