[rb-general] Unreproducible test logs in output

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Fri May 12 14:11:08 CEST 2017

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:28:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Devil's advocate for a second - it is sufficient that the output
> appears on https://buildd.debian.org so anyone interested enough can
> look there.

totally agreed. (except for the URL, that could be whereever…)

putting build logs in the binary packages because they are unreliable/have too
many failures seems like a gross hack to me.

Nothing to be fixed (and probably not even discussed within Debian) *now*, but
I think we should bring this up on debian-devel once Stretch has been released.

For now, I'd suggest filing bugs so these issues are not forgotten.
(Alternativly, though IMO less prefered, putting notes in notes.git could also
serve as a reminder for us.)

	Holger (and yes, I've read the replies…)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20170512/4919b652/attachment.sig>

More information about the rb-general mailing list