[rb-general] BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP code examples and test cases
holger at layer-acht.org
Tue Mar 14 21:45:53 CET 2017
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:34:00PM +0000, Ximin Luo wrote:
> I've made these changes. If anyone disagrees, please speak up soon because I'm almost ready to finalise and publish it.
Ximin, first, thanks a lot for your continued work on this. Your recent mails
on this topic made me smile.
Second, please don't "finalise and publish it" as just a version 1.0. Please
call it 0.9-rc1 (or such, the "rc1" part is the important bit) and ask for
feedback, both on our lists, the weekly news and even via twitter.
Once the feedback has settled, call it 1.0 and publish it.
> I've filled in the introduction and motivation sections, and also tweaked the wording of the other parts a bit.
> You can see it here: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/build-path-prefix-map-spec.git/log/
> Or with slightly nicer formatting here: https://github.com/infinity0/rb-prefix-map/blob/master/spec.in.rst
do you consider this rc1 already? I'd like nice HTML output of rc1 ;-)
> The final end result will look like docbook HTML output, similar to the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH spec. You can see it by running `make`.
I've created a jenkins job to build the html, see
It failed with
make: *** No rule to make target 'build-path-prefix-map-spec.html'. Stop.
which is because the build job basically calls "make $reponame.html" (which
works nicely for source-date-epoch-spec.git but not so much for
And while this could be fixed in the Makefile, I'd recommened to rename
spec.xml in build-path-prefix-map-spec.git to build-path-prefix-map-spec.xml,
what do you think?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the rb-general