[rb-general] rb-prefix-map spec: don't be as democratic to consumers
infinity0 at debian.org
Tue Mar 14 15:35:00 CET 2017
> Or alternatively, Ximin if you could explain what part of my message
> wasn't clear, I'd be happy to clarify it.
Basically, I don't see how the current spec (with the semi-open mapping algorithm) breaks any of the use-cases you described:
> I was thinking of a different use-case. One use-case, the "two libxz's"
> example, is that of an upstream project that wants to allow multiple
> downstreams to build it reproducibly, regardless of which compiler those
> downstreams use. Each individual downstream would use either gcc or
> clang, but the upstream project needs to support both.
Can you describe this in more detail?
More information about the rb-general