[rb-general] results.json spec
holger at layer-acht.org
Tue Feb 7 15:39:37 CET 2017
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:07:07PM +0100, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> based on https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.json
> I have created
> and made a draft of a spec for RFC:
> should probably be converted to .rst and pushed to git in the end.
very cool! (haven't look at the spec yet though…)
> my generator script
> is pretty specific to the meta-files created during my rebuild-test-process
> but since it is only 80 lines, it should be easy to adapt.
> open questions: should it use ISO date (2017-02-07 14:02:59) instead of UNIX epoch integer?
we want to use this date to put it in webpages, for humans to consume. So not
having to convert an epoch into an ISO date will make things a bit easier :)
> does it matter if we differ in machine/arch strings like amd64/x86_64 ?
you mean, "we differ" as in "debian and opensuse differ"? then I think that's
fine, a.) this is the way we call these (differently) and b.) we wont compare
architectures directly, rather we would compare packages. (and for packages we
will use notes.git to map different source package names together…)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the rb-general