[rb-general] [PATCH] Document timestamp clamping

[Holger Levsen]

Hi Daniel,

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:19:14PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'm happy this revision, thanks, Ximin!  If anyone is concerned about
> this distracting from the rest of the spec, i could also imagine a
> parenthetical aside about "(this is not common)" or "(but removing these
> timestamps entirely is preferred)".

could you maybe create a branch (or two or three) in the spec git repo, 
and put those suggestions in there? IMO it's totally fine to push to
git.debian.org/git/reproducible/source-date-epoch-spec.git just prefix
the branch names with "dkg/" or "dkg/clamping-proposals" or such.

I'm not convinced we'll get agreement on this online in the next four
weeks, but I'm rather confident those branches will be very helpful to
find consensus at the summit in 4 weeks in Berlin :)


-- 
cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20161110/211e1aec/attachment.sig>