[rb-general] GNU coding standards discussion

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Fri Dec 2 04:05:48 CET 2016

On Thu 2016-12-01 15:23:29 -0500, Ian Jackson wrote:
> gnu-prog-disc are having an extensive discussion on the topic of what
> to put in standards.texi for reproducible builds.  A day or two ago, I
> proposed (editing a much briefer definition from John Darrington) a
> draft of such a definition, below.

I'll echo Ximin's thanks for championing this within GNU, Ian.  Much

> I'd like your input.  Is this broadly the right kind of thing ?
> Should `make install-strip' be changed to `make install' ?

i think it should be changed, yes.  Why should the debug symbols vary in
a reproducible build?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20161201/67daf478/attachment.sig>

More information about the rb-general mailing list