[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] history: fix typos

[kpcyrd (@kpcyrd)]

kpcyrd pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
67487b97 by kpcyrd at 2025-08-17T12:46:03+02:00
history: fix typos

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- _docs/history.md


Changes:

=====================================
_docs/history.md
=====================================
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ it was also hard to determine what the actual build path has been
 accurately.
 
 Second attempt used `debugedit` which is used by Fedora and
-other to change the source paths to a canonical location after the
+others to change the source paths to a canonical location after the
 build. Unfortunately, `gcc` write debug strings in a *hashtable*.
 `debugedit` will not reorder the table after patching the strings, so
 the result is still unreproducible. Adding this feature to `debugedit`
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ looked difficult. We can still make the approach work by passing
 `-fno-merge-debug-strings` but this is space expensive. The [second
 large scale rebuild](https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Rebuild20140126) used
 the latter approach. It was still difficult to guess the initial build
-path properly. Stéphane Glondu was the first to [suggest to using a
+path properly. Stéphane Glondu was the first to [suggest using a
 canonical build
 path](http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20140217/000065.html)
 to solve the issue.
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ inefficient shell scripts by structured Python with a HTML output.
 At the end of September 2014, Holger Levsen started to work on
 [jenkins.debian.net](https://jenkins.debian.net/) to perform
 continuous integration for build reproducibility. Packages from *sid*
-started to be built and rebuild. This initially introduced variations
+started to be built and rebuilt. This initially introduced variations
 for time and file ordering, and was extended later on to also use
 different users, groups, hostnames, and locales.
 
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ The results were visible through a new
 [reproducible.debian.net](https://reproducible.debian.net/)
 website. The process of analyzing reproducibility failures could now be
 more easily shared. New contributors indeed showed up and started
-submitting sorting out common issues and providing patches.
+submitting fixes, sorting out common issues and providing patches.
 
 In July of 2015, [Vagrant begins hosting ARM
 boards](https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20150727/002492.html)
@@ -231,14 +231,14 @@ was well received at FOSDEM 2015 and was followed up by
 *  [tracker.debian.org](https://tracker.debian.org) inclusion, see [739497](https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739497)
 *  [Debian Developer's Packages Overview](https://qa.debian.org/developer.php) (DDPO) inclusion
 *  debbindiff gained .rpm support
-*  [Debian Maintainer Dashbord](https://udd.debian.org/dmd/) inclusion
+*  [Debian Maintainer Dashboard](https://udd.debian.org/dmd/) inclusion
 
 Finally, for now, not even two weeks after FOSDEM 2015 a mail with the
 subject "[Reproducible Builds --- proof of concept successful for 83%
 of all sources in
 main](https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/02/msg00007.html)"
 was send to
-[debian-devel-announce at lists.ddebian.org](https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/)
+[debian-devel-announce at lists.debian.org](https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/)
 officially anouncing the project to the Debian developer community at
 large.
 
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ large.
 
 ## Google Summer of Code 2015
 
-During the summer of 2015 akira and Dhole will be working on moving
+During the summer of 2015 akira and Dhole worked on moving
 forward reproducible builds as a Google Summer of Code project. Follow
 the links to check the accepted [akira's
 application](https://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2015/StudentApplications/MariaValentinaMarinRodrigues)
@@ -266,12 +266,12 @@ Short mention of Lunar's talk to be written here. Add links.
 ## DebConf15
 
 To be written: the first real life meeting of the Debian team. Talk
-given, roundstable discussion, hacking session. Mentioned in several
+given, roundtable discussion, hacking session. Mentioned in several
 talks, incl DPL key note.
 [SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH]({{ "/docs/source-date-epoch" | relative_url }})
 was invented around this time too.
 
-## Continous tests for Coreboot, OpenWrt, NetBSD, FreeBSD, Arch Linux and Fedora
+## Continuous tests for Coreboot, OpenWrt, NetBSD, FreeBSD, Arch Linux and Fedora
 
 to be written: tests for these six projects have been added between June
 and December 2015...
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ and December 2015...
 ## Reproducible World Summit, December 1-3, 2015, Athens, Greece
 
 to be written, maybe some photos to be shared, pointers to reports, new
-mailinglists, new irc channel, an even wider community has started to
+mailing lists, new irc channel, an even wider community has started to
 grow,
 [website](https://reproducible-builds.org/events/athens2015/).
 
@@ -294,12 +294,12 @@ in embedded `.BUILDINFO` files that were introduced in [pacman
 In January 2017 we learned, that John Gilmore [wrote an interesting
 mail about how Cygnus.com worked on reproducible builds in the early
 1990s](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2017-January/000309.html).
-It's eye opening to see how the dealt with basically the very same
+It's eye opening to see how they dealt with basically the very same
 problems we're dealing with today, how they solved them and then to
 realize that most of this has been forgotten and bit-rotted in the last
 20 years. How will we prevent history repeating itself here?
 
-On August 21st 2017 reproducible-builds where first mentioned in Debian
+On August 21st 2017 reproducible-builds were first mentioned in Debian
 Policy, 4.1.0.
 
 On October 16th 2017 intrigeri reported successes in reproducing [Tails](https://tails.boum.org) ISO images
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ started during [Marrakesh
 In April 2020, Arch Linux announced their official [reproducible.archlinux.org rebuilderd
 instance](https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-04/) and [reached
 out](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-April/001905.html)
-for community-ran instances to double-check their reported results.
+for community-run instances to double-check their reported results.
 
 A workshop about [reproducing official Arch Linux packages from source
 code](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-April/001892.html)
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ Spring.
 
 ## 2023
 
-In May 2023, problems with Linux' build-time generated module signing keys were
+In May 2023, problems with Linux's build-time generated module signing keys were
 [raised on the reproducible-builds mailing
 list](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2023-May/002991.html).
 
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ reproducible builds, reproduce.debian.net and debian-repro-status.
 
 ## ToDo
 
-please see the old [Reproducibile Builds Publicity](https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/About#Publicity) page in the Debian wiki
+please see the old [Reproducible Builds Publicity](https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/About#Publicity) page in the Debian wiki
 which we still need to migrate to reproducible-builds.org.
 
 ## Contributors



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/67487b973e565baee6ebe2ea8815d859935c8d3c

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/67487b973e565baee6ebe2ea8815d859935c8d3c
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20250817/990da65e/attachment.htm>