[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] 2022-12: 16 more RB apps in F-Droid

FC Stegerman (@obfusk) gitlab at salsa.debian.org
Thu Jan 5 11:01:57 UTC 2023



FC Stegerman pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
d608e625 by FC Stegerman at 2023-01-05T12:01:39+01:00
2022-12: 16 more RB apps in F-Droid

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- _reports/2022-12.md


Changes:

=====================================
_reports/2022-12.md
=====================================
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ These scripts are often necessary in the Android/APK ecosystem due to these file
 
 This reflects the consensus view within the Reproducible Builds project: pursuing a situation in language or package ecosystems where binaries are bit-for-bit identical (over requiring a bespoke ecosystem-specific tool) is not a luxury demanded by purist engineers, but rather the only *practical* way to demonstrate reproducibility. *obfusk* also [announced the first release of their own set of tools](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2022-December/002769.html) on our mailing list.
 
-Related to this, *obfusk* also [posted to an issue filed against Mastodon](https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon-android/issues/4#issuecomment-1336259343) regarding the difficulties of creating bit-by-bit identical APKs, especially with respect to copying [v2/v3 APK signatures](https://source.android.com/docs/security/features/apksigning/v2) created by different tools, and they also reported that some APK ordering differences were not caused by building on macOS after all, but by using [Android Studio](https://developer.android.com/studio) [[...](https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/issues/2816#note_1204147286)].
+Related to this, *obfusk* also [posted to an issue filed against Mastodon](https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon-android/issues/4#issuecomment-1336259343) regarding the difficulties of creating bit-by-bit identical APKs, especially with respect to copying [v2/v3 APK signatures](https://source.android.com/docs/security/features/apksigning/v2) created by different tools; they also reported that some APK ordering differences were not caused by building on macOS after all, but by using [Android Studio](https://developer.android.com/studio) [[...](https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/issues/2816#note_1204147286)] and that F-Droid [added 16 more apps published with Reproducible Builds](https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/issues/2844) in December.
 
 ---
 



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/d608e6259d1d9d058f7addb907548b561c7531fa

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/d608e6259d1d9d058f7addb907548b561c7531fa
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20230105/22d54d52/attachment.htm>


More information about the rb-commits mailing list