[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] 2023 11: add picture of a postit note written in Hamburg

[Holger Levsen (@holger)]

Holger Levsen pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
e045f011 by Holger Levsen at 2023-12-06T14:14:19+01:00
2023 11: add picture of a postit note written in Hamburg

Signed-off-by: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>

- - - - -


2 changed files:

- _reports/2023-11.md
- + images/reports/2023-11/postit-rb-summit-hamburg-20231101.jpg


Changes:

=====================================
_reports/2023-11.md
=====================================
@@ -81,9 +81,13 @@ On [our mailing list](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general/
 
 As [recently reported in the most recent *Debian Developer News*](https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/11/msg00003.html), Paul Gevers has integrated a package's reproducibility status into the way Debian 'migrates' packages into the next stable release. For the `amd64`, `arm64`, `i386` and `armhf` architectures, data is collected from the [Reproducible Builds testing framework](https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian) is collected by this migration software even though, at the time of writing, it neither causes nor migration bonuses nor blocks migration. Indeed, the information only results are visible on Britney's [*excuses*](https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html) as well as on individual packages' pages on [*tracker.debian.org*](https://tracker.debian.org).
 
-* As a followup on an idea started at the recent R-B summti in Hamburg, Alexander Couzens and Holger Levsen started work on a cache or tailored frontend for snapshot.debian.org, which is not yet ready for usage, but which already provided a promising outlook: the general idea is that for rebuilding Debian one doesnt need the whole >140TB data of snapshot.debian.org but ony the subset of the packages which were
+* As a followup on an idea started at the recent R-B summit in Hamburg, Alexander Couzens and Holger Levsen started work on a cache or tailored frontend for snapshot.debian.org, which is not yet ready for usage, but which already provided a promising outlook: the general idea is that for rebuilding Debian one doesnt need the whole >140TB data of snapshot.debian.org but ony the subset of the packages which were
 used for building. Turns out, for amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64 and s390 for trixie, unstable and experimental this is only around 500GB, so less than 1%. More information is available on https://rebuilder-snapshot.debian.net and we hope that this service becomes usable in the coming weeks.
 
+[![]({{ "/images/reports/2023-11/postit-rb-summit-hamburg-20231101.jpg" | relative_url }})](https://rebuilder-snapshot.debian.net/)
+
+* A postit note written by Jan-Benedict Glaw at the summit in Hamburg, confirming Holger Levsen's theory that rebuilding all Debian packages needs a very small subset of packages. The text states that 69200 packages (in sid) lists 24850 packages in their .buildinfo files, in 80200 variations.
+
 <br>
 
 ### Ubuntu Launchpad now supports `.buildinfo` files


=====================================
images/reports/2023-11/postit-rb-summit-hamburg-20231101.jpg
=====================================
Binary files /dev/null and b/images/reports/2023-11/postit-rb-summit-hamburg-20231101.jpg differ



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/e045f011c6ac7b7fa3c99faa41a0c0719ba58779

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/e045f011c6ac7b7fa3c99faa41a0c0719ba58779
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20231206/3ec384d5/attachment.htm>