[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] 2022-08: fix 2 typos

[Bernhard M. Wiedemann (@bmwiedemann-guest)]

Bernhard M. Wiedemann pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
143fc034 by Bernhard M. Wiedemann at 2022-09-08T12:20:56+02:00
2022-08: fix 2 typos

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- _reports/2022-08.md


Changes:

=====================================
_reports/2022-08.md
=====================================
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Lastly, Chengyu HAN updated the [Reproducible Builds website]({{ "/" | relative_
 
 This month, the `essential` and `required` package sets became 100% reproducible in Debian *bookworm* on the `amd64` and `arm64` architectures. These two subsets of the full Debian archive refer to Debian package "priority" levels as described in the [§2.5 Priorities](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities) section of the [Debian Policy](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/) — there is no canonical "minimal installation" package set in Debian due to its diverse methods of installation.
 
-As it happens, these package sets are *not* reproducible on the `i386` architecture because the `ncurses` package on that architecture s not yet reproducible, and the `sed` package currently fails to build from source on `armhf` too. The full list of reproducible packages within these package sets can be viewed within our QA system, such as on the page of [`required` packages in `amd64`](https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/bookworm/amd64/pkg_set_required.html) and the list of [`essential` packages on `arm64`](https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/bookworm/arm64/pkg_set_essential.html), both for Debian *bullseye*.
+As it happens, these package sets are *not* reproducible on the `i386` architecture because the `ncurses` package on that architecture is not yet reproducible, and the `sed` package currently fails to build from source on `armhf` too. The full list of reproducible packages within these package sets can be viewed within our QA system, such as on the page of [`required` packages in `amd64`](https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/bookworm/amd64/pkg_set_required.html) and the list of [`essential` packages on `arm64`](https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/bookworm/arm64/pkg_set_essential.html), both for Debian *bullseye*.
 
 <br>
 
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ This works for (at least) Debian *unstable*, *bullseye* and *bookworm*, and is t
 
 Work has also taken place to ensure that the canonical *debootstrap* and *cdebootstrap* tools are *also* capable of bootstrapping Debian reproducibly, although it currently requires a few extra steps:
 
-1. "Clamping" the modification time of files that newer than `$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` to be not greater than `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`.
+1. "Clamping" the modification time of files that are newer than `$SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` to be not greater than `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`.
 
 2. Deleting a few files. For *debootstrap*, this requires the deletion of `/etc/machine-id`, `/var/cache/ldconfig/aux-cache`, `/var/log/dpkg.log`, `/var/log/alternatives.log` and `/var/log/bootstrap.log`, and for *cdebootstrap* we also need to delete the `/var/log/apt/history.log` and `/var/log/apt/term.log` files as well.
 



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/143fc03421f72a76d6acc45429f34a6b9cd21c0f

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/143fc03421f72a76d6acc45429f34a6b9cd21c0f
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20220908/1883cd69/attachment.htm>