[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-presentations][master] dc22 presentation: more tweaking
Holger Levsen (@holger)
gitlab at salsa.debian.org
Mon Jul 18 15:05:27 UTC 2022
Holger Levsen pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-presentations
Commits:
b8519083 by Holger Levsen at 2022-07-18T17:05:19+02:00
dc22 presentation: more tweaking
Signed-off-by: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>
- - - - -
1 changed file:
- 2022-07-19-reproducible-builds-for-bullseye-bookwork-and-beyond/index.html
Changes:
=====================================
2022-07-19-reproducible-builds-for-bullseye-bookwork-and-beyond/index.html
=====================================
@@ -168,8 +168,9 @@
<br>
<h3>
This is a pre-recorded remote talk.<br><br>
+ <span class="fragment">
Please enjoy DebConf22!<br><br>
- I miss you, lovely Debian people!
+ I miss you, lovely Debian people!</span>
</h3>
</section>
@@ -349,6 +350,19 @@ Arch Linux is 86.4% reproducible with 1701 bad and 10849 good packages.
<section data-background="images/dc22-logo.svg" data-background-size="12%" data-background-position="90% 10%">
<h3>Summary of reproducibility of other projects (all AIUI)</h3>
<p>Many projects support reproducible builds by now, but it's unclear what that means, how it's enforced and how users can know and be confident...</p>
+ <p class="fragment">We still haven't found what we're looking for.</p>
+ </section>
+
+ <section data-background="images/dc22-logo.svg" data-background-size="12%" data-background-position="90% 10%">
+ <h3>Summary of reproducibility of other projects (all AIUI)</h3>
+ <p>Many projects support reproducible builds by now, but it's unclear what that means, how it's enforced and how users can know and be confident...</p>
+ <p>We mostly still haven't found what we're looking for, because it's hard and without 100% it's pointless also.</p>
+ </section>
+
+ <section data-background="images/dc22-logo.svg" data-background-size="12%" data-background-position="90% 10%">
+ <h3>Summary of reproducibility of other projects (all AIUI)</h3>
+ <p>Many projects support reproducible builds by now, but it's unclear what that means, how it's enforced and how users can know and be confident...</p>
+ <p>We mostly still haven't found what we're looking for, because it's hard and without 100% it's basically impossible to do a sensible user experience.</p>
</section>
<section data-background="images/dc22-logo.svg" data-background-size="12%" data-background-position="90% 10%">
@@ -469,7 +483,7 @@ Arch Linux is 86.4% reproducible with 1701 bad and 10849 good packages.
<section data-background="images/dc22-logo.svg" data-background-size="12%" data-background-position="90% 10%">
<h3>CI versus rebuilds:</h3>
<ul>
- <li>We have no <strong>Debian</strong> infrastructure rebuilding Debian packages. The reproducible-builds.org rebuilders are builders, not rebuilders.<p class="fragment">https://beta.tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian <em>is showing</em> rebuilds of ftp.debian.org - huge thanks to Frédéric Pierret.</p></li>
+ <li>We have no <strong>Debian</strong> infrastructure rebuilding Debian packages. The reproducible-builds.org rebuilders are builders, not rebuilders.<p class="fragment">https://beta.tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian <em>is showing</em> rebuilds of ftp.debian.org - huge thanks to Frédéric Pierret for this PoC.</p></li>
<li class="fragment">Sadly, Frédéric's rebuilder is down atm...</li>
</ul>
</ul>
@@ -479,10 +493,10 @@ Arch Linux is 86.4% reproducible with 1701 bad and 10849 good packages.
<section data-background="images/dc22-logo.svg" data-background-size="12%" data-background-position="90% 10%">
<h3>CI versus rebuilds:</h3>
<ul>
- <li>We have no <strong>Debian</strong> infrastructure rebuilding Debian packages. The reproducible-builds.org rebuilders are builders, not rebuilders.<p>https://beta.tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian <em>is showing</em> rebuilds of ftp.debian.org - huge thanks to Frédéric Pierret.</p></li>
+ <li>We have no <strong>Debian</strong> infrastructure rebuilding Debian packages. The reproducible-builds.org rebuilders are builders, not rebuilders.<p>https://beta.tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian <em>is showing</em> rebuilds of ftp.debian.org - huge thanks to Frédéric Pierret for this PoC.</p></li>
<li style="font-size: 90%">Up until recently we had two main blockers for rebuilders:</li>
<ul style="font-size: 80%">
- <li class="fragment">>3000 packages without .buildinfo files, fixed by myself end of February 2021 (and again in June 2022).</li>
+ <li class="fragment">>3000 packages without .buildinfo files, fixed by myself in February 2021 and in June 2022.</li>
<li class="fragment">snapshot.debian.org was (and is) unusable for rebuilds, fixed by Frédéric Pierret and josch since June 2021, by providing a partial mirror for amd64 only and only going back until January 2017.</li>
</ul>
@@ -660,10 +674,10 @@ Arch Linux is 86.4% reproducible with 1701 bad and 10849 good packages.
<h3>trixie goals</h3>
<ul>
<li class="fragment">I still haven't found what I'm looking for, these are rather long term goals, but nothing strategic yet:</li>
- <li class="fragment">0 bugs with patches unuploaded. Currently there are 313 of these. 2 NMUs per week, uploaded to DELAYED/14.</li>
<li class="fragment">snapshot.debian.org usable for mass rebuilds by many users for all architectures.</li>
- <li class="fragment">.buildinfo files known and used by <code>dak</code>.</li>
+ <li class="fragment">0 bugs with patches unuploaded. Currently there are 313 of these. 2 NMUs per week, uploaded to DELAYED/14.</li>
<li class="fragment">#863622: apt: warn when installing packages that are not reproducible</li>
+ <li class="fragment">.buildinfo files known and used by <code>dak</code>.</li>
</ul>
</section>
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-presentations/-/commit/b85190830c0e733e3e6a29349273fffaaecfd8c4
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-presentations/-/commit/b85190830c0e733e3e6a29349273fffaaecfd8c4
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20220718/d73c31a0/attachment.htm>
More information about the rb-commits
mailing list