[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] Add OpenSUSE logo to november and december 2021 reports

Arnout Engelen (@raboof-guest) gitlab at salsa.debian.org
Tue Jan 4 10:53:57 UTC 2022



Arnout Engelen pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
8c5ff574 by Arnout Engelen at 2022-01-04T11:53:31+01:00
Add OpenSUSE logo to november and december 2021 reports

- - - - -


3 changed files:

- _reports/2021-11.md
- _reports/2021-12.md
- + images/reports/2021-12/opensuse.png


Changes:

=====================================
_reports/2021-11.md
=====================================
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ In addition, 90 reviews of Debian packages were added, 18 were updated and 23 we
 
 Work has begun on classifying reproducibility issues in packages within the [Arch Linux](https://archlinux.org/) distribution. Similar to the analogous effort within Debian (outlined above), package information is listed in a human-readable [`packages.yml` YAML file](https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/reproducible-archlinux-notes/-/blob/main/packages.yml) and a sibling [`README.md`](https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/reproducible-archlinux-notes/-/blob/main/README.md) file shows how to classify packages too.
 
+[![]({{ "/images/reports/2021-12/opensuse.png#right" | relative_url }})](https://www.opensuse.org/)
+
 Finally, Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted his [monthly reproducible builds status report](https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/S5CIAMYJAEHKTPUDWI5U6YGZDTUP46TT/) for [openSUSE](https://www.opensuse.org/) and Vagrant Cascadian updated a link [on our website](https://reproducible-builds.org) to link to the [GNU Guix reproducibility testing overview](https://data.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master/latest-processed-revision/package-reproducibility) [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/commit/c8d19cb)].
 
 <br>


=====================================
_reports/2021-12.md
=====================================
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ In Debian this month, 70 reviews of packages were added, 27 were updated and 41
 
 <br>
 
+[![]({{ "/images/reports/2021-12/opensuse.png#right" | relative_url }})](https://www.opensuse.org/)
+
 In the world of [openSUSE](https://www.opensuse.org/), however, Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted his [monthly reproducible builds status report](https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/VGQAHNQ24ZMVUJ33MQUSWLWPPOQ5KRLK/).
 
 <br>


=====================================
images/reports/2021-12/opensuse.png
=====================================
Binary files /dev/null and b/images/reports/2021-12/opensuse.png differ



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/8c5ff57486ddd7df2aefd71a2a489e8bad500648

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/8c5ff57486ddd7df2aefd71a2a489e8bad500648
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20220104/dcb2a036/attachment.htm>


More information about the rb-commits mailing list