[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] 2020 10: add year not to confuse readers

[Holger Levsen]

Holger Levsen pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
dc5934e8 by Holger Levsen at 2020-11-11T14:03:21+01:00
2020 10: add year not to confuse readers

Signed-off-by: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- _reports/2020-10.md


Changes:

=====================================
_reports/2020-10.md
=====================================
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ On Saturday 10th October, Morten Linderud gave a talk at [Arch Conf Online 2020]
 
 > The previous year has seen great progress in Arch Linux to get reproducible builds in the hands of the users and developers. In this talk we will explore the current tooling that allows users to reproduce packages, the rebuilder software that has been written to check packages and the current issues in this space.
 
-During the [Reproducible Builds summit in Marrakesh]({{ "/events/Marrakesh2019/" | relative_url }}), developers from the [GNU Guix](https://guix.gnu.org), [NixOS](https://nixos.org) and [Debian](https://debian.org) distributions were able to produce a bit-for-bit identical [GNU Mes](https://www.gnu.org/software/mes/) binary, despite using three different major versions of GCC. Since this summit, additional work resulted in a bit-for-bit identical Mes binary using `tcc`, and last month [a fuller update was posted to this effect]({{ "/news/2019/12/21/reproducible-bootstrap-of-mes-c-compiler/" | relative_url }}) by the individuals involved. This month, however, David Wheeler updated his extensive page on [*Fully Countering Trusting Trust through Diverse Double-Compiling*](https://dwheeler.com/trusting-trust/), remarking that:
+During the [Reproducible Builds summit in Marrakesh in 2019]({{ "/events/Marrakesh2019/" | relative_url }}), developers from the [GNU Guix](https://guix.gnu.org), [NixOS](https://nixos.org) and [Debian](https://debian.org) distributions were able to produce a bit-for-bit identical [GNU Mes](https://www.gnu.org/software/mes/) binary, despite using three different major versions of GCC. Since this summit, additional work resulted in a bit-for-bit identical Mes binary using `tcc`, and last month [a fuller update was posted to this effect]({{ "/news/2019/12/21/reproducible-bootstrap-of-mes-c-compiler/" | relative_url }}) by the individuals involved. This month, however, David Wheeler updated his extensive page on [*Fully Countering Trusting Trust through Diverse Double-Compiling*](https://dwheeler.com/trusting-trust/), remarking that:
 
 > GNU Mes rebuild is definitely an application of [Diverse Double-Compiling]. [..] This is an awesome application of DDC, and I believe it's the first publicly acknowledged use of DDC on a binary
 



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/dc5934e8f2849fac29f0f05a320dc35d66699a67

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/dc5934e8f2849fac29f0f05a320dc35d66699a67
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20201111/bc1c6138/attachment.htm>