[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] 2020-04: fix 1 grammar issue

[Bernhard M. Wiedemann]

Bernhard M. Wiedemann pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
496ead53 by Bernhard M. Wiedemann at 2020-05-06T10:43:16+02:00
2020-04: fix 1 grammar issue

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- _reports/2020-04.md


Changes:

=====================================
_reports/2020-04.md
=====================================
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Elsewhere, Nicolas Boulenguez [wrote a patch](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
 
 [![]({{ "/images/reports/2020-04/archlinux.png#right" | prepend: site.baseurl }})](https://archlinux.org)
 
-In the [Arch Linux](https://archlinux.org/) project, *kpcyrd* reported that [they held their first "rebuilder workshop"](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-April/001892.html). The session was held on IRC and participants were provided  document with instructions on how to install and use Arch's [`repro`](https://github.com/archlinux/archlinux-repro/) tool. The meeting resulted in multiple people with no prior experience of Reproducible Builds validate their first package. Later in the month *kpcyrd* also announced that it was [now possible to run independent rebuilders](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-April/001905.html) in Arch, a "hands-off, everything just works™" solution to distributed package verification.
+In the [Arch Linux](https://archlinux.org/) project, *kpcyrd* reported that [they held their first "rebuilder workshop"](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-April/001892.html). The session was held on IRC and participants were provided a document with instructions on how to install and use Arch's [`repro`](https://github.com/archlinux/archlinux-repro/) tool. The meeting resulted in multiple people with no prior experience of Reproducible Builds validate their first package. Later in the month *kpcyrd* also announced that it was [now possible to run independent rebuilders](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-April/001905.html) in Arch, a "hands-off, everything just works™" solution to distributed package verification.
 
 Bernhard M. Wiedemann set up a new [`ismypackagereproducibleyet.org`](https://ismypackagereproducibleyet.org/) service that takes a package name as input and concisely displays whether the package is reproducible in a number of distributions. For example, it can quickly [show the status of Perl](https://ismypackagereproducibleyet.org/?pkg=perl) as being reproducible on [openSUSE](https://www.opensuse.org/) but not in [Debian](https://debian.org/). In addition, Bernhard improved the documentation of his deliberately ["unreproducible package"](https://github.com/bmwiedemann/theunreproduciblepackage) to add some example patches for hash issues. [[...](https://github.com/bmwiedemann/theunreproduciblepackage/commit/53d4263b461b7b7f1239e34536eaf77e5c61b174)].
 



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/496ead53b7266900efcf3f93f9d7a1d3838f6075

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/496ead53b7266900efcf3f93f9d7a1d3838f6075
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20200506/e602ed46/attachment.htm>