[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] 2020-07: fix typos + grammar

Bernhard M. Wiedemann gitlab at salsa.debian.org
Fri Aug 7 20:12:59 UTC 2020



Bernhard M. Wiedemann pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
4f71d49e by Bernhard M. Wiedemann at 2020-08-07T22:12:51+02:00
2020-07: fix typos + grammar

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- _reports/2020-07.md


Changes:

=====================================
_reports/2020-07.md
=====================================
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ draft: true
 **Welcome to the July 2020 report from the [Reproducible Builds](https://reproducible-builds.org) project.**
 {: .lead}
 
-In these monthly reports, we round-up the things that we have been up to over the past month. As a quick recap, the motivation behind the Reproducible Builds effort is to ensure no flaws have been introduced from the original source code to he pre-compiled binaries we install on our systems. If you're interested in contributing to the project, [please visit our main website]({{ "/" | relative_url }}).
+In these monthly reports, we round-up the things that we have been up to over the past month. As a quick recap, the motivation behind the Reproducible Builds effort is to ensure no flaws have been introduced from the original source code to the pre-compiled binaries we install on our systems. If you're interested in contributing to the project, [please visit our main website]({{ "/" | relative_url }}).
 
 ## General news
 
@@ -29,11 +29,11 @@ An issue in [Zephyr](https://www.zephyrproject.org/), a small-footprint kernel d
 
 [![]({{ "/images/reports/2020-07/libsodium.png#right" | relative_url }})](https://doc.libsodium.org/)
 
-Reproducible Builds developer *kpcryd* commented on an [pull request against the libsodium cryptographic library wrapper for Rust](https://github.com/sodiumoxide/sodiumoxide/pull/418#issuecomment-653692194), arguing against the testing of CPU features at compile-time. He noted that:
+Reproducible Builds developer *kpcyrd* commented on a [pull request against the libsodium cryptographic library wrapper for Rust](https://github.com/sodiumoxide/sodiumoxide/pull/418#issuecomment-653692194), arguing against the testing of CPU features at compile-time. He noted that:
 
 > I've accidentally shipped broken updates to users in the past because the build system was feature-tested and the final binary assumed the instructions would be present without further runtime checks
 
-[David Kleuker](davidak.de) also asked a question on [our mailing list](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general) about using [`SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` with the `install(1)` tool](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-July/001991.html) from [GNU coreutils](https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/). When comparing two installed packages he noticed that the filesystem 'birth times' differed between them. [Chris Lamb replied](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-July/001995.html) after realising that this was actually an consequence of using an outdated of [*diffoscope*](https://diffoscope.org/) and that a fix has was released in [*diffoscope* version 146](https://diffoscope.org/news/diffoscope-146-released/) released in May 2020.
+[David Kleuker](https://davidak.de) also asked a question on [our mailing list](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general) about using [`SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` with the `install(1)` tool](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-July/001991.html) from [GNU coreutils](https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/). When comparing two installed packages he noticed that the filesystem 'birth times' differed between them. [Chris Lamb replied](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-July/001995.html) after realising that this was actually a consequence of using an outdated version of [*diffoscope*](https://diffoscope.org/) and that a fix was in [*diffoscope* version 146](https://diffoscope.org/news/diffoscope-146-released/) released in May 2020.
 
 Later in July, John Scott posted asking for [clarification regarding on the Javascript files on our website](https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2020-July/001999.html) to add metadata for [LibreJS](https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/), a browser extension that blocks non-free Javascript scripts. Chris Lamb investigated the issue and realised that we could drop a number of unused Javascript files [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/commit/3b71cb0)][[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/commit/222b306)][[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/commit/539eb99)] and added unminified versions of [Bootstrap](https://getbootstrap.com/) and [jQuery](https://jquery.com/) [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/commit/fb57181)].
 
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Jean-Romain Garnier also made the following changes:
 * Improve the output of side-by-side diffs by detecting added lines better. ([!64](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/65696a9))
 * Remove offsets before instructions in `objdump` [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/3e72c1c)][[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/cbcb41e)] and remove raw instructions from [ELF](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executable_and_Linkable_Format) tests [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/e9e2904)].
 
-### [Website]((https://reproducible-builds.org/))
+### [Website](https://reproducible-builds.org/)
 
 [![]({{ "/images/reports/2020-07/website.png#right" | relative_url }})](https://reproducible-builds.org/)
 
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ This month, Holger Levsen made the following changes:
 
     * Tweak the rescheduling of various architecture and suite combinations. [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/commit/afd0f5cb)][[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/commit/0af6eeb4)]
     * Fix links for "404" and "not for us" icons. ([#959363](https://bugs.debian.org/959363))
-    * Further work ona rebuilder prototype, for example correctly processing the `sbuild` exit code. [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/commit/cfa2ba45)][[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/commit/19ce0560)]
+    * Further work on a rebuilder prototype, for example correctly processing the `sbuild` exit code. [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/commit/cfa2ba45)][[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/commit/19ce0560)]
     * Update the [sudo](https://www.sudo.ws/) configuration file to allow the node health job to work correctly. [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/commit/135c33a4)]
     * Add `php-horde` packages back to the `pkg-php-pear` package set for the *bullseye* distribution. [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/commit/e9a7296f)]
     * Update the version of [`debrebuild`](https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/blob/master/scripts/debrebuild.pl). [[...](https://salsa.debian.org/qa/jenkins.debian.net/commit/2a2dd31d)]



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/4f71d49e1b8b8ef6915ca7940d55e9307751e70c

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/4f71d49e1b8b8ef6915ca7940d55e9307751e70c
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20200807/97d8ea63/attachment.htm>


More information about the rb-commits mailing list