[diffoscope] diffoscope commit mails

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Tue Feb 14 20:50:11 CET 2017

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 07:16:41PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:04:35PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > > Shouldn't we drop the mails to reproducible-commits at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > > > and just send them to diffoscope at lists.reproducible-builds.org?!
> > > IMHO, we shouldn't email them to diffoscope at l.r-b.o either, but instead
> > > rb-commits at l.r-b.o, same for the other non-debian specific stuff.
> > 
> > hm, that makes rb-commits at l.r-b.o more noisy and less specific, so maybe we should
> > use diffoscope-commits at lists.reproducible-builds.org instead?
> I don't think it wold: rb-commits is *not used* at all right now, last
> email was on August (so I'm led to believe some post-commit hook broke
> somewhere), and all the other things are updated much less often than
> diffoscope.

I'm getting commits there every day, eg for diffoscope the last was:

Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:39:58 +0000
From: Maria Glukhova <siamezzze-guest at moszumanska.debian.org>
To: reproducible-commits at lists.alioth.debian.org, diffoscope at lists.reproducible-builds.org
Subject: [diffoscope] branch siamezzze/containers updated (5a5c341 -> 9570f1c)
Reply-To: reproducible-builds at lists.alioth.debian.org, siamezzze-guest at users.alioth.debian.org
List-Id: Commit messages for the Reproducible Builds project <reproducible-commits.lists.alioth.debian.org>

> The only thing that I can think of that would clash with this would be
> dreamed shared notes, that by definition would need to go in that
> mailing list.

Please don't call this a dream…

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/diffoscope/attachments/20170214/1e8cc3c0/attachment.sig>

More information about the diffoscope mailing list