[rb-general] software release archive

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:22:03AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Kinda. Some of them aren't "buildd"-buildable in the Debian sense -
> they require a web-browser to generate the PDF (append "?print" to the
> URL, then print-as-PDF after changing some background settings IIRC).

I see.

> Thus, I think we should indeed go through presentations.git, generate
> as many PDFs as possible, and add them manually to reproducible-lfs or
> similar.
>
> Is that sensible from your point of view?

Yes, that's fine.  But then we should also set a more comprehensive
policy for this.  For example:
 * make sure to use the same name between presentations.git and lfs.git
 * always have a .pdf in lfs.git for all entries in presentations.git

On alioth we also have 3 that are made with revealjs, what would you do
about those?

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/attachments/20180523/e4a78c93/attachment.sig>