[Git][reproducible-builds/reproducible-website][master] fix typos in Paris report

[Jelle van der Waa]

Jelle van der Waa pushed to branch master at Reproducible Builds / reproducible-website


Commits:
909cd60d by Jelle van der Waa at 2019-02-17T11:17:45Z
fix typos in Paris report

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- _events/paris2018/report.md


Changes:

=====================================
_events/paris2018/report.md
=====================================
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ Sources
 
 Trust & Delivery
 
--   What constitutes a proff of reproducibility?
+-   What constitutes a proof of reproducibility?
 
 -   How do we distinguish or attest that an artifact was built on
     trusted hardware or in a trusted environment?
@@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ Hash of package? buildinfo?
 
 Not all projects have buildinfo files
 
-Are .buildinfo files without binary checksums useless? (Archlinux has
+Are .buildinfo files without binary checksums useless? (Arch Linux has
 those)
 
 Is it enough / useful if rebuilders publish a stripped down version of
@@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ become a problem
 <a name="Toc11382_331763073"></a>
 #### Cross distribution participation
 
-representatives from Archlinux, openSUSE, Guix, Nix, Alpine Linux,
+representatives from Arch Linux, openSUSE, Guix, Nix, Alpine Linux,
 Debian
 
 "package finder tool\" interface for searching infomation about



View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/commit/909cd60daf751582f9107a2a922ecbb5837e0a4e

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/commit/909cd60daf751582f9107a2a922ecbb5837e0a4e
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-commits/attachments/20190217/4cbbb9e2/attachment.html>